In an opinion released on February 5, 2008, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Universal Underwriters Insurance Company. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Paradis, Docket Nos. SC 17756, 17757, slip. op. (Conn. 2008). The opinion is a favorable result for the insurance industry. Universal had commenced a […]

Halloran & Sage obtained a pair of favorable summary judgment rulings in Federal Court barring coverage under homeowners’ policies on the basis that the conduct alleged in the underlying complaint was essentially intentional tortious conduct and did not constitute an occurrence under the defendant/insured’s policy. On this basis, the courts ruled that the insured was […]

In Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Continental Casualty Company, 2010 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1169 (Conn. Super. Ct. May 27, 2010) (Cosgrove, J.), Halloran & Sage’s Insurance Coverage Group successfully obtained summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action involving an insurance coverage dispute arising from a slip-and-fall at a construction site. In the underlying […]

Halloran & Sage is pleased to sponsor the Connecticut Bar Association Young Lawyers Section’s upcoming Diversity Town Hall: “Navigating Race and the Constitutional Rights of Students and the Media at American Universities.” Matthew Necci, Chair of the Firm’s Workers’ Compensation Practice Group, is also Chair of the YLS. The free program—to be held on February […]

Halloran & Sage is pleased to provide continued support and funding to Capital Preparatory Magnet School’s Learn to Ski and Ski Racing programs, which offer students of the Hartford school the opportunity to participate in skiing and snowboarding. The programs provide equipment, lift tickets and lessons at Ski Sundown in New Hartford. Dan Scapellati has […]

The Insurance Coverage Group obtained a favorable summary judgment ruling in federal district court that the umbrella coverage part of a policy that was issued by Patriot General Insurance Company did not provide liability coverage in connection with an automobile-motorcycle accident.

In Sullivan v. Guzman, 42 CLR 233 (Adams, J.), the Firm represented a liability insurer which took the position it had no duty to afford coverage to a defendant in an underlying liability claim. Because the tort defendant thus had no coverage, the tort plaintiff amended the underlying liability claim to add his uninsured motorist […]

In Acmat v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, a decision officially released on May 29, 2007, the Connecticut Supreme Court held that policyholders may only recover attorney’s fees in coverage litigation where the insured proves a claim of common-law or statutory bad faith. Up until now, most insureds had been asserting claims for attorney’s […]

The Connecticut Superior Court, Dooley, J., granted a motion to strike an insured’s bad faith claim in Trans-Clean Corp. v. Evanston Ins. Co., et al., No. FBT-CV-09-4028802 (Sept. 23, 2010).  In its complaint, the insured alleged that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company violated the duty of good faith and fair dealing by denying coverage […]

In Royal Indemnity Company, et al. v. Pendleton King, et al., No. 3:03cv2178, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72654 (D. Conn. Sept. 28, 2007), the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) held that the defendant insurers did not owe a duty to defend or to indemnify their insureds, Pendleton King, Daphne […]