In Sullivan v. Guzman, 42 CLR 233 (Adams, J.), the Firm represented a liability insurer which took the position it had no duty to afford coverage to a defendant in an underlying liability claim. Because the tort defendant thus had no coverage, the tort plaintiff amended the underlying liability claim to add his uninsured motorist carrier as a defendant. The uninsured motorist carrier in turn then filed a third-party complaint to bring the Firm’s client into that action as a third party defendant, seeking to obtain a judgment that the claim was covered after all, and that the Firm’s client, rather than the uninsured motorist carrier, was the carrier liable to afford coverage for the underlying liability action. The court granted our motion to strike the third-party complaint, holding that Connecticut’s impleader statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-102a, authorizes such third-party complaints only against a party who may be liable for all or a part of the plaintiff’s claim. Since the uninsured motorist carrier bringing the third-party complaint was seeking a declaration regarding our client’s duty to its insured, and not to the plaintiff, the third party complaint was procedurally inappropriate and ordered stricken.